Generally, stellar magnitude refers to the apparent brightness of an astronomical object. The brightness magnitude system applied to the stars is also applied to other astronomical objects such as planets, comets, nebulae, galaxies and even the sun and moon.
The Basic Mathematics Of The Stellar Magnitude Ranking System
Stellar magnitude 3 is fainter than magnitude 1, which may seem odd at first glance. This is because stellar brightness is generally measured in units referred to as magnitudes, which are analogous to ranks.
1st magnitude is to 3rd magnitude as 1st prize is to 3rd prize. This is why magnitude 1 is brighter than magnitude 3 and magnitude 0 is even brighter than magnitude 1 and magnitude −1 is even brighter yet!
Given a set of stellar magnitudes, the object with the greatest numerical value is always the faintest of the set and the lowest magnitude value indicates the brighest object. Negative magnitudes always indicate very bright objects, for example, sun at 26.74, the full moon at 12.5, or Venus at 4.5, etc. An asteroid may have a magnitude such as +10, which is very faint and Pluto even fainter at magnitude +14, which is extremely faint. For comparison, the star Vega (alpha Lyrae) is often cited as a general example of a star of 0 (zero) magnitude.
Here, the distances to the stars can be ignored. We do not need to think about the distances when simply ranking stars by their relative apparent brightness in the sky as we see them from Earth. However, when we start to move around in space or compare stars to each other, as if sidebyside, then we will have to consider their distances too.
The stellar magnitude system is designed mathematically so that a difference of exactly 5 magnitudes equates to an apparent brightness ratio (b) of exactly 100fold. It is a base10 logarithmic system of astronomical brightness scaling analogous to the Richter or decibel scales used to measure energy intensity.
The general relationship between apparent difference in magnitude vs apparent ratio in brightness may be expressed by the simple equation
Eq. 1
Apparent Magnitude With Respect to Distance
Having covered the general relationship between apparent magnitude and brightness, we can now proceed to the next step and add distance to the problem. Using the following equations, we can mathematically move a star around in space and compute its apparent brightness at any given distance from any given known starting values.
This also allows us to mathematically compare the relative brightness of any two stars sidebyside at any common distance. For example, how bright a star would our sun appear to be if viewed from the same distance as Alpha Centauri? Or how bright would Alpha Centauri appear to be if it replaced our sun?
Let
m_{1} = Apparent magnitude of a star at distance d_{1}
m_{2} = Apparent magnitude of the same star at distance d_{2}
Distances can be in any convenient, consistent units, such as AUs, light years, etc.
The relationship between apparent magnitude and distance may be expressed in terms of any of the four variables as in the following equations.
A Randomized Numerical Example of Computing the Brightness Ratio Between Two Objects
Given the apparent magnitudes of two astronomical objects (e.g, stars, planets, etc.), Equation 1
computes their comparative brightness ratio (b).
Let:
m_{1} = 2.836 = Magnitude of brighter object
and
m_{2} = +4.384 = Magnitude of fainter object
and
k = 2.5118864315095801 = 5 ^{th} root of 100
The brightness ratio (b) between the brighter and fainter object can be found by:
k = 2.5118864315095801
dm = m2 − m1
= (+4.384) − (2.836)
= +7.220
b = k ^ dm
= k ^ (+7.220)
= 772.680585
This means that an object with magnitude 2.836 is about 772.7 times brighter than an object of +4.384 magnitude.
